UBS Yield Enhancement Strategy a losing option

This post is written on behalf of Girard Bengali, APC.

UBS Yield Enhancement Strategy a losing option

Some leading investment advisors are in hot water over losing clients tens of millions of dollars in complex investment schemes known as Yield Enhancement Strategies (YES) or Collateral Yield Enhancement Strategies (CYES).

UBS Group AG along with Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley and others are all accused of selling the strategy to high net worth individuals as a low-risk add-on to existing investment portfolios when in fact the options strategies could–and did–result in heavy losses.

What is a Yield Enhancement Strategy?

As it is currently marketed to customers, YES is a way to improve investment returns with minimum risk. This is accomplished through a complex trade or series of trades involving the purchase and sale of financial derivatives known as “options.”

Options are investment contracts that are bought and sold in the financial markets. The buyer gets the right to buy or sell an underlying asset, such as stock in a company, at an agreed-to price. The seller receives a payment, known as a premium, in exchange for promising to sell or buy the underlying asset at the agreed-to price, known as the “strike price.”

While YES is an appealing marketing title, the strategy is really what traders on Wall Street know as the sale of an “iron condor” spread. While there are many intricacies to this kind of trade, it involves both the purchase and sale of options, with the sales bringing in more than the purchases cost.

This strategy is best applied to underlying assets that are not expected to change much between the sale and the expiration of the contract. If, at the time of expiration, the underlying asset has not moved much, then the investor will keep the modest gains from selling the iron condor spread. The purchases, meanwhile, are intended to protect the investor if the asset moves up or down more than expected.

Unfortunately for investors, the underlying asset in the case of the UBS YES was the S&P 500 index, which experienced large fluctuations in price in 2018. This volatility caused the iron condors sold by traders at UBS to make losses in the range of $50-60 million.

Wall Street loses money all the time, why is UBS YES the subject of litigation?

Yes, in the financial markets, for every winner there’s a loser. In the case of YES, however, due to the complexity of the product and the unique risks involved in the iron condor, investors who lost money in these schemes may be able to recover those losses by suing for investment fraud.

Investment fraud has a very broad definition that goes well beyond boiler room cons and Ponzi schemes. In the context of the UBS, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley and Credit Suisse Yield Enhancements Products, it can include the following:

  • Self-interested investment advice: The purchase and sale of the options in the iron condor strategy yields fees for the firms involved whether the trades are winners or losers.
  • Unsuitable investment advice: Many individual investors are not sophisticated enough to fully understand the trades involved in YES.
  • Overconcentration of portfolio assets: Overconcentrating an investor’s portfolio in one or two risky investment strategies is considered a form of investment fraud.
  • Omission of material information: If you do not have all the information you need to make an informed investment decision about a product that a broker is trying to sell you, you may have a claim for investment fraud if you suffer losses as a result.

I lost money in a YES investment, what can I do to get my money back?

Large Wall Street firms like UBS, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America Merrill Lynch and Credit Suisse are required to arbitrate fraud claims by investors through FINRA arbitration, an alternative dispute resolution procedure that provides the best forum for timely outcomes in financial fraud cases.

The best place to start is to contact an experienced FINRA arbitration lawyer. Investors have six years to file a FINRA claim, but if large scale litigation has shown anything, it’s that the early bird gets compensation. Wait too long and there may not be anything left to recover!

related Posts

SEC Charges Investment Adviser and Principals for Breaching Fiduciary Duties

Litigation Release No. 24817 / May 13, 2020 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ambassador Advisors, LLC, Bernard I. Bostwick, Robert E. Kauffman, and Adrian E. Young, No. 5:20-cv-02274 (E.D. Pa. filed May 13, 2020) Source: The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged registered investment adviser Ambassador Advisors, LLC, and its principals, Bernard I. Bostwick,

Read More »

A Timeline of Robinhood’s Legal and Regulatory Stumbles

Robinhood, the stock trading startup valued at $7.6B, has seen as much volatility as the equities market it allows its users to trade in over the last two years. The brokerage, previously notorious for its less-than-transparent approach to business, is in hot water over its app’s performance during recent market volatility. As pressure begins to

Read More »

Another Prestigious Selection

Securities Fraud Attorneys We Sue Brokerage Firms to Recover Investment Losses Robert J. Girard IIChosen to 2020 Super Lawyers Omar H. BengaliChosen to 2020 Rising Stars We Welcome and appreciate Your Referrals 866-778-6821 Los Angeles • Newport Beach • San Francisco Robert J. Girard II Selected to 2020 Super Lawyers List Robert Girard, co-founding partner

Read More »

UBS Lawsuits: Y.E.S. Investments Two Thumbs Down

Girard Bengali, APC, is currently representing clients of UBS who lost money in the YES (Yield Enhancement Strategy). YES was marketed as a safe investment strategy, but unfortunately it was much riskier than investors anticipated and many have lost significant investments.You may be entitled to a recovery of your losses – contact our SEC &

Read More »

FINRA Arbitration Panel Awards $347k for Girard Bengali Client

In an article published today at FinancialPlanning, Girard Bengali, APC partners Robert Girard and Omar Bengali were quoted in relation to the recent award for their client, Laguna Financial Group. The panel ordered Schwab to pay $347,000 in damages and legal fees to Joseph Ziomek, who accused the firm and Purshe Kaplan Sterling Investments of

Read More »
Scroll to Top