OVERVIEW OF THE SEC’S ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES

This post is written on behalf of Girard Bengali, APC.

OVERVIEW OF THE SEC’S ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES

On behalf of Girard Bengali, APC posted in securities arbitration and litigation on Friday, April 26, 2019.

Many financial professionals in the Los Angeles area, basically all of those who trade in regulated stocks, bonds and other securities, may find themselves under investigation by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.

The SEC is responsible for regulating the nation’s public financial markets to assure that they are fair and transparent. This fairness and transparency in turn encourages investment and economic growth.

On the flip side, though, financial professionals subject to the SEC’s jurisdiction have a lot of detailed rules and regulations that they must follow. If they run afoul of these rules, they may become the target of the SEC’s enforcement activity.

Some of these rules may seem easy enough to follow. For instance, most honest people know intuitively that they should not lie or steal in the course of their work. However, in other cases, professionals can make genuine mistakes. A careless tip to a client, for example, can lead to an allegation of insider trading.

In the most extreme cases, the SEC assists the Department of Justice or other law enforcement agencies with pursuing criminal charges.

More likely, though, a professional who gets cross-wise with the SEC will face either a civil action in court or an administrative action. The end result of either one of these steps can be very unpleasant. A professional may face a court injunction, monetary penalties, accountings, the loss of one’s license to work with regulated securities and other sanctions.

A financial professional who is facing any type of enforcement action from the SEC has a lot at stake, including his professional reputation and, in some cases, even their ability to keep working in his career field. A financial professional in this situation would want to consider getting the help of an attorney with experience handling securities arbitration and litigation as well as administrative actions.

related Posts

A Timeline of Robinhood’s Legal and Regulatory Stumbles

Robinhood, the stock trading startup valued at $7.6B, has seen as much volatility as the equities market it allows its users to trade in over the last two years. The brokerage, previously notorious for its less-than-transparent approach to business, is in hot water over its app’s performance during recent market volatility. As pressure begins to

Read More »

Another Prestigious Selection

Securities Fraud Attorneys We Sue Brokerage Firms to Recover Investment Losses Robert J. Girard IIChosen to 2020 Super Lawyers Omar H. BengaliChosen to 2020 Rising Stars We Welcome and appreciate Your Referrals 866-778-6821 Los Angeles • Newport Beach • San Francisco Robert J. Girard II Selected to 2020 Super Lawyers List Robert Girard, co-founding partner

Read More »

UBS Yield Enhancement Strategy a losing option

Some leading investment advisors are in hot water over losing clients tens of millions of dollars in complex investment schemes known as Yield Enhancement Strategies (YES) or Collateral Yield Enhancement Strategies (CYES). UBS Group AG along with Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley and others are all accused of selling the strategy to high net worth individuals

Read More »

UBS Lawsuits: Y.E.S. Investments Two Thumbs Down

Girard Bengali, APC, is currently representing clients of UBS who lost money in the YES (Yield Enhancement Strategy). YES was marketed as a safe investment strategy, but unfortunately it was much riskier than investors anticipated and many have lost significant investments.You may be entitled to a recovery of your losses – contact our SEC &

Read More »

FINRA Arbitration Panel Awards $347k for Girard Bengali Client

In an article published today at FinancialPlanning, Girard Bengali, APC partners Robert Girard and Omar Bengali were quoted in relation to the recent award for their client, Laguna Financial Group. The panel ordered Schwab to pay $347,000 in damages and legal fees to Joseph Ziomek, who accused the firm and Purshe Kaplan Sterling Investments of

Read More »
Scroll to Top