JUDGE RULES AGAINST LAW FIRM IN SANCTIONS MOTION

This post is written on behalf of Girard Bengali, APC.

JUDGE RULES AGAINST LAW FIRM IN SANCTIONS MOTION

On behalf of Girard Bengali, APC on Thursday, May 2, 2019.

Workers are generally entitled to equal pay and other protections based on gender and other attributes. A $100 million lawsuit against the law firm Morrison & Foerster LLP, which was originally founded in California and has an office in Los Angeles, claims that pregnant workers were placed on a “mommy track” that made it difficult to achieve career success. The suit was brought by seven women who have so far remained anonymous. However, the identities of the plaintiffs may need to be revealed if the case proceeds.

The firm filed a legal action of its own against one of the plaintiffs in the case. It claimed that she took action knowing that the claims against the company were baseless. Furthermore, it claimed that the former employee signed a release of claims document before going on leave because of her pregnancy. It sought sanctions against the woman and her attorneys while claiming that her claim should be barred because she negotiated the agreement with the firm.

However, her attorney claimed that she was coerced into signing the agreement because of economic circumstances including being the breadwinner for her family. A judge dismissed the claim for sanctions.

Individuals who are treated differently because of their gender may have grounds to take legal action against their employers. Generally speaking, employers must make accommodations for those who are pregnant or who have recently given birth. This may include allowing an employee to perform light work or giving that person extra time to pump milk. In addition to providing reasonable accommodations, employers cannot retaliate against an employee for taking time off because of a pregnancy or complications related to it. People who have been harmed in such a manner might want to discuss their situation with an attorney.

related Posts

UBS Lawsuits: Y.E.S. Investments Two Thumbs Down

Girard Bengali, APC, is currently representing clients of UBS who lost money in the YES (Yield Enhancement Strategy). YES was marketed as a safe investment strategy, but unfortunately it was much riskier than investors anticipated and many have lost significant investments.You may be entitled to a recovery of your losses – contact our SEC &

Read More »

FINRA Arbitration Panel Awards $347k for Girard Bengali Client

In an article published today at FinancialPlanning, Girard Bengali, APC partners Robert Girard and Omar Bengali were quoted in relation to the recent award for their client, Laguna Financial Group. The panel ordered Schwab to pay $347,000 in damages and legal fees to Joseph Ziomek, who accused the firm and Purshe Kaplan Sterling Investments of

Read More »

WHAT TO DO AFTER BEING HANDED THE FORM U5

On behalf of Girard Bengali, APC on Monday, June 3, 2019. As Wall Street’s standards continue to change and evolve, many financial advisers in Los Angeles and around the country are being terminated for relatively minor infractions. Once they receive a Form U5, they must come up with a long-term plan for getting back on their feet.

Read More »

FINRA COULD IMPOSE NEW REGULATIONS ON BROKER-DEALERS AND FIRMS

On behalf of Girard Bengali, APC on Tuesday, May 28, 2019. Brokers and financial firms in California and nationwide may be interested in a report that the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority could crack down on over 60 firms after proposing a new rule. The authority oversees over 3,700 broker-dealers engaged in securities transactions. While a FINRA executive

Read More »
Scroll to Top